Research proposal is a non bias document

Supporting documents - Supporting documents - How to apply

may include a list of suggested reviewers (including email address and institutional affiliation) who they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal. submission of proposals allows multiple organizations to submit a unified set of certain proposal sections, as well as information unique to each organization as specified below. signing the proposal, the authorized organizational representative hereby certifies that the organization will comply with title vi of the civil rights act of 1964 (42 usc 2000d), title ix of the education amendments of 1972 (20 usc 1681 et seq.(2) for other nsf grants when more than ,000 has been budgeted in the proposal for repair, alteration or improvement (construction) of a building or facility. signing the nsf cover sheet and submitting this proposal, the authorized organizational representative is providing the certifications set out below. regarding federal tax obligations: when the proposal exceeds ,000,000, the aor is required to complete a certification regarding federal tax obligations. all collaborative proposals must clearly describe the roles to be played by the other organizations, specify the managerial arrangements, and explain the advantages of the multi-organizational effort within the project description. personnel category for which nsf funds are requested must indicate, in the parentheses provided on the proposal budget, the number of persons expected to receive some support from those funds. to submission, it is strongly recommended that an administrative review be conducted to ensure that proposals comply with the instructions, in the format specified. if anticipated, any compensation for such personnel in excess of two months must be disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and must be specifically approved by nsf in the award notice budget. the information contained in this guide will assist the organization in preparing documents which nsf requires to conduct administrative and financial reviews of the organization.[ ] project summary:[ ] the project summary may only be uploaded as a supplementary document if use of special characters is necessary. the proposal is a renewal proposal, or an accomplishment-based renewal proposal, the applicable box must be checked. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. csr was very receptive to the offer and this september 2016 peer review notes article on the top statistical issues seen in proposals is the first product of such a meeting. proposals normally compete with proposals for research or education projects. signing the proposal certification pages, aors for prospective grantees located in fema-designated special flood hazard areas are certifying that adequate flood insurance has been or will be obtained in the following situations:(1) for nsf grants for the construction of a building or facility, regardless of the dollar amount of the grant; and. if a decision is made to fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the official iacuc approval letter to the cognizant program. for obtaining authorization to deviate from nsf proposal preparation instructions are provided in gpg chapter ii. information should be clearly identified as "equipment proposal" biographical information and uploaded as a single pdf file in the other supplementary documents section of the proposal. of mentoring activities include, but are not limited to: career counseling; training in preparation of grant proposals, publications and presentations; guidance on ways to improve teaching and mentoring skills; guidance on how to effectively collaborate with researchers from diverse backgrounds and disciplinary areas; and training in responsible professional practices. submitted collaborative proposals and proposals that include subawards are a single unified project and should include only one supplemental combined data management plan, regardless of the number of non-lead collaborative proposals or subawards included.[ ] the proposed work is appropriate for funding by nsf, and is not a duplicate of, or substantially similar to, a proposal already under consideration by nsf from the same submitter., equipment and other resources: if there will be support from other sources for the conference, such information should be included in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal.(vii) total direct costs (line h on the proposal budget). section of the proposal is used to assess the adequacy of the resources available to perform the effort proposed to satisfy both the intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.. while training plans are not required to be included in proposals submitted to nsf, institutions are advised that they are subject to review upon request. the application must be submitted as a preliminary proposal in fastlane.. for fellowship proposals submitted by individuals that involve use of vertebrate animals, a copy of the approval letter from the iacuc (including assurance number and organizational signature) should be included in the supplementary documentation section of the proposal or sent directly to the cognizant nsf program officer. requests are made in conjunction with regular competitive proposals, or as a supplemental funding request to an existing nsf award. to our recommended word limit - the selectors don't have time to read long documents running to many pages. these exploratory proposals also may be submitted directly to an nsf program, but the eager mechanism should not be used for projects that are appropriate for submission as "regular" (i. requested proposal information noted above will be used to determine the applicable proposal preparation business rules that must be followed.[ ] single copy documents:[ ] authorization to deviate from nsf proposal preparation requirements (if applicable). organizations are responsible for identifying nsf-funded life sciences proposals that could potentially be considered dual use research of concern as defined in the us government policy for institutional oversight of life sciences dual use research of concern and for compliance with the requirements established in that policy. prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "certification regarding debarment, suspension, ineligibility and voluntary exclusion - lower tier covered transaction", provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions. if we request additional documents you may send them using our online form. the specific nature, purpose, and need for equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in the proposal to permit evaluation by knowledgeable reviewers. nsf will combine the proposal submission for printing or electronic viewing. submitted collaborative proposals and proposals that include subawards are a single unified project and should include only one supplemental combined data management plan, regardless of the number of non-lead collaborative proposals or subawards included.(ii) during the full proposal submission stage, the proposing organization should identify in the block entitled, "show related preliminary proposal number", the related preliminary proposal number assigned by nsf. the box for "disclosure of lobbying activities" must be checked on the proposal cover sheet only if, pursuant to paragraph 2 of the certification, submission of the sf lll is required. group travel grantees are required to retain supporting documentation that funds were spent in accordance with the original intent of the proposal.

THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL TEMPLATE - Unifr

proposals to any nsf program require operational worksheets by the first wednesday of june in the year before any proposed fieldwork. signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary participant is providing the certification set out below. small type size makes it difficult for reviewers to read the proposal; consequently, the use of small type not in compliance with the above guidelines may be grounds for nsf to return the proposal without review. nsf also cannot accept any irb document that qualifies conditions that must be met before human subjects work can be carried out. you may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.(viii) indirect costs (also known as facilities and administrative costs (f&a) for colleges and universities) (line i on the proposal budget). the proposal is:A collaborative proposal from one organization (see gpg chapter ii. nsf authorization to deviate from these instructions must be received prior to proposal submission. regarding lobbying: when the proposal exceeds 0,000, the aor is required to complete a certification regarding lobbying restrictions. "rapid" proposal type must be selected in the proposal preparation module in fastlane. a list of all persons in alphabetical order (including their current organizational affiliations) who are currently, or who have been collaborators or co-authors with the individual on a project, book, article, report, abstract or paper during the 48 months preceding the submission of the proposal. such documentation may be required in final reports and is subject to audit. are advised that fastlane does not automatically paginate a proposal. the exception of the disclosure of lobbying activities (sf lll) identified below, the procedures for submission of the proposal certifications differ from those used with other single-copy documents. entering the proposal preparation module, the pi will be prompted to select information describing the nature and type of proposal being developed. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. if a decision is made to fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the irb approval letter to the cognizant program. proposal budget may request funds for the costs of documenting, preparing, publishing or otherwise making available to others the findings and products of the work conducted under the grant. these issues apply to both the technical aspects of the proposal and the way in which the project may make broader contributions. for example, proposals for the operations and maintenance of research vessels may list the project/performance site as the vessels home port. each section of the proposal that is uploaded as a file should be individually paginated prior to being uploaded to the electronic system. addition, the supplementary documentation section should alert nsf officials to unusual circumstances that require special handling, including, for example, proprietary or other privileged information in the proposal, matters affecting individual privacy, required intergovernmental review under e. these issues apply to both the technical aspects of the proposal and the way in which the project may make broader contributions. cognizant program officer handling the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the proposer for further information. pis are strongly encouraged to contact the cognizant nsf program officer prior to submission of a collaborative proposal. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. each proposal26 that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers27 must include, as a supplementary document, a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such individuals. failure to submit the required sections will result in the proposal not being accepted14, or being returned without review. failure to include these headings will result in the proposal being returned without review. all collaborative proposals must clearly describe the roles to be played by the other organizations, specify the managerial arrangements, and explain the advantages of the multi-organizational effort within the project description.(i) salaries and wages (lines a and b on the proposal budget).(1) the prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from a covered transaction by any federal department or agency; (b) have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (federal, state or local) terminated for cause or default. a waiver has been granted by nsf, a potential reviewer also may be barred from reviewing a proposal, if it involves individuals with whom he/she has a personal relationship, such as a close relative, current or former collaborator, or former thesis student/advisor. this checklist is not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines. [insert the full name of the principal investigator] entitled [insert the proposal title] is selected for funding by nsf, it is my intent to collaborate and/or commit resources as detailed in the project description or the facilities, equipment or other resources section of the proposal. unless stipulated in a specific program solicitation, however, such proposals will be subject to the 15-page project description limitation established in section (ii) above. for proposals that contain a subaward(s), each subaward must include a separate budget justification of no more than three pages. proposers also may designate persons they would prefer not review the proposal, indicating why. small type size makes it difficult for reviewers to read the proposal; consequently, the use of small type not in compliance with the above guidelines may be grounds for nsf to return the proposal without review. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. proposals normally compete with proposals for research or education projects. concurrent submission of a proposal to other organizations will not prejudice its review by nsf. order for nsf, and its reviewers, to assess the scope of a proposed project, all organizational resources necessary for, and available to, a project must be described in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal (see gpg chapter ii.

  • GPG Chapter II. Proposal Preparation Instructions

    this proposal pin and the temporary proposal id generated by fastlane when the non-lead proposal is created must be provided to the lead organization before the lead organization submits its proposal to nsf.., case studies) of actual problems (with non-identifying specifics if possible) you have seen in proposals. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. must follow instructions for selection of an applicable nsf division/office and program(s) to which the proposal should be directed. the approval letter must affirm that an animal-use protocol covering the proposed activities has been approved, and should explicitly list the proposers name, the title and number of the nsf proposal, and the date of iacuc approval. proposal must contain a budget for each year of support requested. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this guide; rapid proposals must otherwise be compliant with the gpg. note that the proposal may contain up to five pages to describe the results. if anticipated, any compensation for such personnel in excess of two months must be disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and must be specifically approved by nsf in the award notice budget. prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to whom this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. standards to be used for data and metadata format and content (where existing standards are absent or deemed inadequate, this should be documented along with any proposed solutions or remedies);. the proposal is a renewal proposal, or an accomplishment-based renewal proposal, the applicable box must be checked. proposal must contain a summary of the proposed project not more than one page in length. the following sections are required for a collaborative proposal submitted by:Non-lead organization. conformance with all preparation and submission instructions is required and will be strictly enforced unless a deviation has been approved in advance of proposal submission. for additional guidance on mentoring and data management plan requirements for collaborative proposals. the proposal is being submitted for consideration by another federal agency, the abbreviated name(s) of the federal agency(ies) must be identified in the spaces provided. must include an outline research proposal with your application – see above and refer to your programme page. funding of rapid awards may be requested only through submission of a proposal that will be subject to full external merit review. the proposal must include relevant information, including countries to be visited (also enter names of countries on the proposal budget), dates of visit, if known. to submission, it is strongly recommended that proposers conduct an administrative review to ensure that proposals comply with the proposal preparation guidelines established in the gpg or the nsf grants. given that such separately submitted proposals constitute a "single" proposal submission to nsf, it is imperative that the proposals be submitted within a reasonable timeframe to one another.(3) the undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.(ix) total direct and indirect costs (f&a) (line j on the proposal budget). conformance is required and will be strictly enforced unless an authorization to deviate from standard proposal preparation requirements has been approved. for the definition and allowability of inclusion of fringe benefits on a proposal budget. these approvals to deviate from nsf proposal preparation instructions may cover a particular program or programs or, in rare instances, an individual deviation for a particular proposal.[ ] project summary:[ ] the project summary may only be uploaded as a supplementary document if use of special characters is necessary. proposals will be reviewed internally by the cognizant nsf program officers, the ideas lab panelists, and other external reviewers, as appropriate. if the proposal includes use of vertebrate animals, supplemental information is required. guidelines specified above establish the minimum type size requirements; however, pis are advised that readability is of paramount importance and should take precedence in selection of an appropriate font for use in the proposal. fastlane uses the rules specified for each type of proposal, (e. these resources are not auditable by nsf and should not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. detailed instructions for the preparation and submission of collaborative proposals are available in fastlane. invited full proposals (which are prepared in accordance with standard research proposal formatting guidelines) must be submitted within two months of receiving nsf notification after the ideas lab. proposers are strongly encouraged to contact the appropriate nsf program to discuss the availability of funding and the appropriate funding mechanisms in advance of proposal submission. the exception of the disclosure of lobbying activities (sf lll) identified below, the procedures for submission of the proposal certifications differ from those used with other single-copy documents. section of the proposal calls for required information on all current and pending support for ongoing projects and proposals, including this project, and any subsequent funding in the case of continuing grants. group travel grantees are required to retain supporting documentation that funds were spent in accordance with the original intent of the proposal.. we’re asking the statistical community for two things by october 31: (i) your comments on this document; (ii) short (one-paragraph) descriptions (i.(x) amount of this request (line l on the proposal budget). regarding lobbying: when the proposal exceeds 0,000, the aor is required to complete a certification regarding lobbying restrictions.
  • ASA Committee on Funded Research Posts Document on Top

    however, inclusion of a subaward or contract in the proposal budget or submission of a request after issuance of an nsf award to add a subaward or contract will document the organizational determination required. a waiver has been granted by nsf, a reviewer cannot review a proposal if:The reviewer, the reviewers spouse, minor child, or business partner;.[ ] if the proposal has been previously declined and is being resubmitted, the proposal has been revised to take into account the major comments from the prior nsf review. if included, these resources will not be auditable and must not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. take active steps to scrutinise and verify documents received during the application process. categories of information that are submitted in conjunction with a proposal are for "nsf use only. to proposals for conferences, symposia, or workshops, if any section is not required, insert text or upload a document in that section of the proposal that states, "not applicable.(vi) other direct costs (lines g1 through g6 on the proposal budget). to submission, it is strongly recommended that proposers conduct an administrative review to ensure that proposals comply with the proposal preparation guidelines established in the gpg or the nsf grants. if the proposal includes use of vertebrate animals, supplemental information is required. in such cases, the item for senior personnel salaries in the proposal may appear as a single figure and the person-months represented by that amount omitted. their name(s) will remain on the cover sheet and the individual(s) role on the project should be described in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal. the aor must use the "authorized organizational representative function" in fastlane to sign and submit the proposal, including the proposal certifications. only acceptable irb approval documents are those that approve a human subjects research protocol; approvals "in concept" are not acceptable. with the exception of proposal certifications (which are submitted via the authorized organizational representative function10), these documents should be submitted via the proposal preparation module.(vi)(e) for additional instructions on preparation of this type of proposal. please note that some program solicitations provide specific guidance on preparation and inclusion of management plans in proposals submitted to nsf. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal). help provide content for the september 2016 peer review notes article, our committee reached out to asa membership for input on what statistical issues they see in non-statistics proposals.(1) the prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: (a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from a covered transaction by any federal department or agency; (b) have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal, state or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (federal, state or local) terminated for cause or default. such personal information is not appropriate for the biographical sketch and is not relevant to the merits of the proposal. conformance is required and will be strictly enforced unless an authorization to deviate from standard proposal preparation requirements has been approved.], the proposer may be requested to submit supplemental post-proposal submission information to nsf in order that a reasonable and accurate assessment of environmental impacts by nsf may be made. unacceptable products are unpublished documents not yet submitted for publication, invited lectures, and additional lists of products.(ii) the lead organization must then enter each non-lead organization(s) proposal pin and temporary proposal id into the fastlane lead proposal by using the "link collaborative proposals" option found on the fastlane "form preparation" screen. possible, please send all supporting documents in a single package. substantial collaboration with individuals not included in the budget should be described in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal (see gpg chapter ii. submit the collaborative proposal, the following process must be completed:29. type of proposal being developed:Research - other than rapid or eager (see gpg chapter ii);. a waiver has been granted by nsf, a disqualifying conflict may exist, if a proposal involves an organization or other entity with which the potential reviewer has a connection. "eager" proposal type must be selected in the proposal preparation module in fastlane. terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person, primary covered transaction, principal, proposal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the definitions and coverage sections of the rules implementing executive order 12549. must be especially careful to follow accepted scholarly practices in providing citations for source materials relied upon when preparing any section of the proposal. note that voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited and line m on the proposal budget will not be available for use by the proposer." proposers are advised to select "no closing date" when the proposal is not submitted in response to any relevant nsf funding opportunity (which includes program descriptions, announcements, or solicitations). will be asked to comment on the quality of the prior work described in this section of the proposal. information is used to help identify potential conflicts or bias in the selection of reviewers. conference proposal must contain the elements identified below:Project summary (gpg chapter ii. that your scanned document is legible before you upload it. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal). proposals to nsf will be reviewed using the two nsb-approved merit review criteria described in greater length in gpg chapter iii. nsf program solicitations require submission of both a preliminary and full proposal as part of the proposal process. a waiver has been granted by nsf, a disqualifying conflict may exist, if a proposal involves an organization or other entity with which the potential reviewer has a connection.
  • Resume of a design engineer
  • Reference Documents - Research Participant Portal

    invited full proposals (which are prepared in accordance with standard research proposal formatting guidelines) must be submitted within two months of receiving nsf notification after the ideas lab. such information must be provided in this section, in lieu of other parts of the proposal (e. information necessary for the review of a proposal must be contained in sections a through i of the proposal. the checklist is not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines. you may choose to supply these documents by post, in which case we will upload them to your application on your behalf. similar information must be provided for all proposals already submitted or submitted concurrently to other possible sponsors, including nsf. such information should be clearly identified as "other personnel" biographical information and uploaded as a single pdf file in the other supplementary documents section of the proposal. if a decision is made to fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the official iacuc approval letter to the cognizant nsf program officer before an award can be issued. known at the time of proposal submission, the intent to enter into such arrangements must be disclosed in the proposal.) and documented in a letter of collaboration from each collaborator. requests for funds for special equipment or assistance to facilitate the participation of individuals with disabilities should be included in the proposed budget for the project and documented in the budget justification. cognizant program officer handling the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the proposer for further information. the proposal also may identify up to four additional co-pis. proposal budget justification should indicate the general types of expendable materials and supplies required. proposal may request funds under any of the categories listed so long as the item and amount are considered necessary, reasonable, allocable, and allowable under 2 cfr 200, subpart e, nsf policy, and/or the program solicitation. the proposal must include relevant information, including countries to be visited (also enter names of countries on the proposal budget), dates of visit, if known.(vi)(e) for additional instructions on preparation of this type of proposal. it is, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared. note that we will acknowledge documents which are posted/emailed to us when they are processed rather than when they are received. project summary may only be uploaded as a supplementary document if use of special characters is necessary. if a decision is made to fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the irb approval letter to the cognizant program. at the nsf program officers discretion (subject to division director concurrence), they may invite none, some, or all of the project ideas as full proposals, with the final funding decision to occur after the full proposals have been received and reviewed. a waiver has been granted by nsf, a reviewer cannot review a proposal if:The reviewer, the reviewers spouse, minor child, or business partner;. if a decision is made to fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the official iacuc approval letter to the cognizant program. section of the proposal calls for required information on all current and pending support for ongoing projects and proposals, including this project, and any subsequent funding in the case of continuing grants.[ ] if there are no facilities, equipment or other resources identified, a statement to that effect has been included in this section of the proposal and uploaded into fastlane. faqs regarding fastlane proposal preparation and submission also are available in the fastlane. note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this guide; eager proposals must otherwise be compliant with the gpg. proposals submitted for this purpose should address the same items as those indicated for conferences (see section 9 above), with particular attention to plans for composition and recruitment of the travel group. the information contained in this guide will assist the organization in preparing documents which nsf requires to conduct administrative and financial reviews of the organization. type of proposal being developed:Research - other than rapid or eager (see gpg chapter ii);.) - for each proposal that describes an international activity, proposers should list the primary countries involved. authorization to deviate from nsf proposal preparation requirements (if applicable)., the foundation does expect that the resources identified in the facilities, equipment, and other resources section will be provided, or made available, should the proposal be funded. the personnel categories listed below, the proposal also may include information on exceptional qualifications that merit consideration in the evaluation of the proposal. requirements apply to all uploaded sections of a proposal, including supplementary documentation. sure that you proof read your proposal before you upload it, and make sure that you upload the final corrected version. for proposals that contain a subaward(s), each subaward must include a separate budget justification of no more than three pages. in either case, the lead organizations proposal must contain all of the requisite sections as a single package to be provided to reviewers (that will happen automatically when procedures below are followed). guidelines specified above establish the minimum type size requirements; however, pis are advised that readability is of paramount importance and should take precedence in selection of an appropriate font for use in the proposal. these strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. signing the nsf cover sheet and submitting this proposal, the authorized organizational representative is providing the certifications set out below. note that voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited and line m on the proposal budget will not be available for use by the proposer.
  • Resume of computer technician
  • Thesis on service quality pdf
  • To any would be terrorists thesis

Research on Bias Crimes

Search for FDA Guidance Documents > Institutional Review Boards

this support extends to the portion of the proposal developed to satisfy the broader impacts review criterion as well as the intellectual merit review criterion, and any additional review criteria specified in the solicitation., the foundation does expect that the resources identified in the facilities, equipment, and other resources section will be provided, or made available, should the proposal be funded. collaborative proposals may be submitted to nsf in one of two methods: as a single proposal, in which a single award is being requested (with subawards administered by the lead organization); or by simultaneous submission of proposals from different organizations, with each organization requesting a separate award. if the proposal is not submitted in response to a specific program description, announcement, or solicitation, proposers should select "grant proposal guide. if the specific location of the international conference is not known at the time of the proposal submission, proposers should enter "worldwide". within seven to fourteen days following the ideas lab, the nsf program officers will determine which project ideas are meritorious and should be invited as full proposals. this special information and supplementary documentation section also is not considered an appendix. to proposals for conferences, symposia, or workshops, if any section is not required, insert text or upload a document in that section of the proposal that states, "not applicable. order for nsf, and its reviewers, to assess the scope of a proposed project, all organizational resources necessary for, and available to, a project must be described in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal (see gpg chapter ii. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. such letters should be provided in the supplementary documentation section of the fastlane proposal preparation module and follow the format instructions specified in gpg chapter ii.[ ] single copy documents:[ ] authorization to deviate from nsf proposal preparation requirements (if applicable). adherence to type size and line spacing requirements also is necessary to ensure that no proposer will have an unfair advantage, by using smaller type or line spacing to provide more text in the proposal.'t overload your application with extra documents - the selectors won't have time to read them and we really don't need them. sections described below represent the body of a research proposal submitted to nsf. the amounts for each budget line item requested must be documented and justified in the budget justification as specified below. the box for "disclosure of lobbying activities" must be checked on the proposal cover sheet only if, pursuant to paragraph 2 of the certification, submission of the sf lll is required. also include those individuals who are currently or have been co-editors of a journal, compendium, or conference proceedings during the 24 months preceding the submission of the proposal. nsf program solicitations require submission of both a preliminary and full proposal as part of the proposal process. may include a list of suggested reviewers (including email address and institutional affiliation) who they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal. only the list of ten will be used in the review of the proposal. a general policy, nsf limits the salary compensation requested in the proposal budget for senior personnel to no more than two months of their regular salary in any one year. for these proposals, the project title must begin with the words "collaborative research: if funded, each organization bears responsibility for a separate award. a waiver has been granted by nsf, a potential reviewer also may be barred from reviewing a proposal, if it involves individuals with whom he/she has a personal relationship, such as a close relative, current or former collaborator, or former thesis student/advisor. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal; also see gpg ii. proposal budget may request costs for professional and consultant services. in such cases, the following instructions apply:(i) during the preliminary proposal stage, the proposing organization should identify the submission as a preliminary proposal by checking the block entitled, "preliminary proposal" on the proposal cover sheet;. as specified below, special information and supplementary documentation must be included as part of the project description (or part of the budget justification), if it is relevant to determining the quality of the proposed work. components in new proposals or in requests for supplements, such as facilitation awards for scientists and engineers with disabilities (fased), research opportunity awards (roas), research experiences for undergraduates (reus), or facilitating research at primarily undergraduate institutions (ruis and roas). sections of the proposal differ based on the organizations role. letters of collaboration are permitted, unless required by a specific program solicitation, letters of support should not be submitted as they are not a standard component of an nsf proposal. you are sending your documents by courier service, omit po box 13420 from the above address. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal; also see gpg ii. funding of eager awards may be requested only through submission of a proposal that will be subject to full external merit review. a proposal that includes reference citation(s) that do not specify a url is not considered to be in violation of nsf proposal preparation guidelines and the proposal will still be reviewed. submission of proposals allows multiple organizations to submit a unified set of certain proposal sections, as well as information unique to each organization as specified below. nsf will not accept or will return without review proposals that are not consistent with these instructions. the budget justification must be no more than three pages per proposal. funding of rapid awards may be requested only through submission of a proposal that will be subject to full external merit review.], the proposer may be requested to submit supplemental post-proposal submission information to nsf in order that a reasonable and accurate assessment of environmental impacts by nsf may be made. if this is not possible (for example where your referee is sending a reference to us directly) please ensure that all documents bear your full name as it appears on the application form and your date of birth or programme choice(s).(2) where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall include an explanation with this proposal. proposals must include a supplementary document of no more than two pages labeled "data management plan".

Writing a Research Project Proposal (generic template)

this special information and supplementary documentation section also is not considered an appendix. specific guidance on the need for additional documentation may be obtained from the organizations sponsored projects office or in the references cited below. equipment proposals, the following must be provided for each auxiliary user:(a) short biographical sketch; and. this generally includes the following types of activities: reports, reprints, page charges or other journal costs (except costs for prior or early publication); necessary illustrations; cleanup, documentation, storage and indexing of data and databases; development, documentation and debugging of software; and storage, preservation, documentation, indexing, etc. do not send your original degree certificate, as documents cannot be returned. equipment proposal must contain all of the following proposal sections:Project summary: gpg chapter ii. prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction. failure to include these headings will result in the proposal being returned without review.(iii) all components of the collaborative proposal must meet any established deadline date and time30, and failure to do so may result in the entire collaborative proposal being returned without review. in order to qualify for support, however, attendance at meetings or conferences must be necessary to accomplish proposal objectives, or disseminate its results. also include those individuals who are currently or have been co-editors of a journal, compendium, or conference proceedings during the 24 months preceding the submission of the proposal. components in new proposals or in requests for supplements, such as facilitation awards for scientists and engineers with disabilities (fased), research opportunity awards (roas), research experiences for undergraduates (reus), or facilitating research at primarily undergraduate institutions (ruis and roas).(a) materials and supplies (including costs of computing devices) (line g1 on the proposal budget). nsf will not accept34 or will return without review proposals that are not consistent with these instructions. proposal not accepted is defined as fastlane will not permit submission of the proposal. proposals for conferences should generally be submitted at least a year in advance of the scheduled date. overview includes a description of the activity that would result if the proposal were funded and a statement of objectives and methods to be employed. where specifically identified in an nsf program solicitation, the applicable us federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) must be used in computing indirect costs (f&a) for a proposal. the letter should indicate approval of the proposed activities, explicitly listing the proposers name and referencing the title of the nsf proposal, and must be submitted prior to an award being issued. these resources are not auditable by nsf and should not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. is imperative that all proposals conform to the proposal preparation and submission instructions specified in the grant proposal guide. categories of information that are submitted in conjunction with a proposal are for "nsf use only. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. once your file is with the selectors we will not add new documents to it until it returns to us. such letters should be provided in the supplementary documentation section of the fastlane proposal preparation module and follow the format instructions specified in gpg chapter ii..Nsf encourages submission of proposals by groups of investigators; often these are submitted to carry out interdisciplinary projects. sure that the documents you send are relevant to your application. the proposal is being submitted for consideration by another federal agency, the abbreviated name(s) of the federal agency(ies) must be identified in the spaces provided. pis who wish to exceed the established page limitations for the project description must request and receive a deviation in advance of proposal submission. personnel categories listed on parts a and b of the proposal budget are defined as follows:1. for example, proposals for the operations and maintenance of research vessels may list the project/performance site as the vessels home port. only the list of ten will be used in the review of the proposal. letters of support submitted in response to a program solicitation requirement must be unique to the specific proposal submitted and cannot be altered without the authors explicit prior approval. if the specific location of the international conference is not known at the time of the proposal submission, proposers should enter "worldwide" on the cover sheet. for obtaining authorization to deviate from nsf proposal preparation instructions are provided in gpg chapter ii. "eager" proposal type must be selected in the proposal preparation module in fastlane.. while training plans are not required to be included in proposals submitted to nsf, institutions are advised that they are subject to review upon request.(f) if the proposal is for renewed support, a description of the relation of the completed work to the proposed work. given that such separately submitted proposals constitute a "single" proposal submission to nsf, it is imperative that the proposals be submitted within a reasonable timeframe to one another. pis who wish to exceed the established page limitations for the project description must request and receive a deviation in advance of proposal submission. such proposals would be designated as an "ideas lab renewal. this checklist is not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines. information is used to help identify potential conflicts or bias in the selection of reviewers.

Supporting documents - Supporting documents - How to apply

Develop a Research Proposal - Document Review and Analysis

(ix) total direct and indirect costs (f&a) (line j on the proposal budget). equipment proposal must contain all of the following proposal sections:Project summary: gpg chapter ii. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. where specifically identified in an nsf program solicitation, the applicable us federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) must be used in computing indirect costs (f&a) for a proposal. nsf will combine the proposal submission for printing or electronic viewing. entering the proposal preparation module, the pi will be prompted to select information describing the nature and type of proposal being developed. participant support costs must be specified, itemized and justified in the budget justification section of the proposal. signing the proposal certification pages, aors for prospective grantees located in fema-designated special flood hazard areas are certifying that adequate flood insurance has been or will be obtained in the following situations:(1) for nsf grants for the construction of a building or facility, regardless of the dollar amount of the grant; and. proposers are strongly advised to review the applicable sections of the gpg pertinent to the type of proposal being developed prior to submission. for these proposals, the project title must begin with the words "collaborative research: if funded, each organization bears responsibility for a separate award. of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited and line m on the proposal budget will not be available for use by the proposer. collaborative proposal is one in which investigators from two or more organizations wish to collaborate on a unified research project. the proposal also may identify up to four additional co-pis. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal." as such, the information is not provided to reviewers for use in the review of the proposal.(i) each non-lead organization must assign their proposal a proposal pin. where applicable, the box for "historic places" must be checked on the proposal cover sheet. gpg chapter v for guidance on preparation of renewal proposals. a proposal that includes reference citation(s) that do not specify a url is not considered to be in violation of nsf proposal preparation guidelines and the proposal will still be reviewed. detailed instructions for the preparation and submission of collaborative proposals are available in fastlane. will assist reviewers and foundation staff in dealing effectively with proposals. in such cases, the following instructions apply:(i) during the preliminary proposal stage, the proposing organization should identify the submission as a preliminary proposal by checking the block entitled, "preliminary proposal" on the proposal cover sheet;. accordance with nsf policy, by signing the proposal, the authorized organizational representative is providing the requisite certification of compliance with national science foundation nondiscrimination regulations and policies. standards to be used for data and metadata format and content (where existing standards are absent or deemed inadequate, this should be documented along with any proposed solutions or remedies);. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal). requests for funds for special equipment or assistance to facilitate the participation of individuals with disabilities should be included in the proposed budget for the project and documented in the budget justification. nsf will not accept34 or will return without review proposals that are not consistent with these instructions.[ ] if the proposal has been previously declined and is being resubmitted, the proposal has been revised to take into account the major comments from the prior nsf review. the recommended format for letters of collaboration is as follows:"if the proposal submitted by dr.(d) a listing of the publications resulting from the nsf award (a complete bibliographic citation for each publication must be provided either in this section or in the references cited section of the proposal); if none, state "no publications were produced under this award. the box for "proprietary or privileged information" must be checked on the proposal cover sheet when the proposal contains confidential budgetary information. if you are unable to upload your documents you may send them via post to:Graduate admissions office. that your scanned document is legible before you upload it. similar information must be provided for all proposals already submitted or submitted concurrently to other possible sponsors, including nsf.[ ] if there are no facilities, equipment or other resources identified, a statement to that effect has been included in this section of the proposal and uploaded into fastlane. if a decision is made to fund the proposal, the organization must provide a signed copy of the official iacuc approval letter to the cognizant nsf program officer before an award can be issued. to submission, it is strongly recommended that an administrative review be conducted to ensure that proposals comply with the instructions, in the format specified. ask you to provide the documents as requested (or as close to them as you can manage) so that we can make a good decision on your application. all other elements of a "full proposal" are waived (i. note that the proposal may contain up to five pages to describe the results. is important that all proposals conform to the instructions provided in the gpg or nsf grants. of collaborative arrangements of significance to the proposal through letters of collaboration.[ ] the proposed work is appropriate for funding by nsf, and is not a duplicate of, or substantially similar to, a proposal already under consideration by nsf from the same submitter.

THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL TEMPLATE - Unifr

Code of Human Research Ethics

) - for each proposal that describes an international activity, proposers should list the primary countries involved. sections of the proposal differ based on the organizations role. pis are strongly encouraged to contact the cognizant nsf program officer prior to submission of a collaborative proposal. of collaborative arrangements of significance to the proposal through letters of collaboration. research proposal should address the following questions:What is your general topic? such information must be provided in this section, in lieu of other parts of the proposal (e.. for fellowship proposals submitted by individuals that involve use of vertebrate animals, a copy of the approval letter from the iacuc (including assurance number and organizational signature) should be included in the supplementary documentation section of the proposal or sent directly to the cognizant nsf program officer. specific guidance on the need for additional documentation may be obtained from the organizations sponsored projects office or in the references cited below. a list of all persons in alphabetical order (including their current organizational affiliations) who are currently, or who have been collaborators or co-authors with the individual on a project, book, article, report, abstract or paper during the 48 months preceding the submission of the proposal. proposers are strongly encouraged to contact the appropriate nsf program to discuss the availability of funding and the appropriate funding mechanisms in advance of proposal submission. in cases where the pi or co-pi has received more than one award (excluding amendments to existing awards), they need only report on the one award most closely related to the proposal.[ ] special information and supplementary documentation:[ ] the types of information identified in gpg chapter ii. accordance with nsf policy, by signing the proposal, the authorized organizational representative is providing the requisite certification of compliance with national science foundation nondiscrimination regulations and policies. proposals submitted for this purpose should address the same items as those indicated for conferences (see section 9 above), with particular attention to plans for composition and recruitment of the travel group. single proposal method allows investigators from two or more organizations who have developed an integrated research project to submit a single, focused proposal. the proposal budget also may request costs for leasing of computer equipment. addition, the supplementary documentation section should alert nsf officials to unusual circumstances that require special handling, including, for example, proprietary or other privileged information in the proposal, matters affecting individual privacy, required intergovernmental review under e. will assist reviewers and foundation staff in dealing effectively with proposals. equipment proposals, the following must be provided for each auxiliary user:(a) short biographical sketch; and. for data management and sharing of the products of research, including preservation, documentation, and sharing of data, samples, physical collections, curriculum materials and other related research and education products should be described in the special information and supplementary documentation section of the proposal (see gpg chapter ii. these approvals to deviate from nsf proposal preparation instructions may cover a particular program or programs or, in rare instances, an individual deviation for a particular proposal.(i) salaries and wages (lines a and b on the proposal budget). is imperative that all proposals conform to the proposal preparation and submission instructions specified in the grant proposal guide. your application is successful, we will request original or certified signed documents prior to registration. note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this guide; rapid proposals must otherwise be compliant with the gpg. documents so that each page is the same way up. as specified below, special information and supplementary documentation must be included as part of the project description (or part of the budget justification), if it is relevant to determining the quality of the proposed work.(d) a listing of the publications resulting from the nsf award (a complete bibliographic citation for each publication must be provided either in this section or in the references cited section of the proposal); if none, state "no publications were produced under this award. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal). where applicable, the box for "historic places" must be checked on the proposal cover sheet. unacceptable products are unpublished documents not yet submitted for publication, invited lectures, and additional lists of products. proposers are strongly advised to review the applicable sections of the gpg pertinent to the type of proposal being developed prior to submission. sections described below represent the body of a research proposal submitted to nsf. if irb approval cannot be obtained at the time of the award action because the development of a human subjects research protocol requires preliminary or other conceptual work to take place, the pi should notify the cognizant nsf program officer assigned to the proposal. these resources are not auditable by nsf and should not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. the data management plan will be reviewed as an integral part of the proposal, considered under intellectual merit or broader impacts or both, as appropriate for the scientific community of relevance.(2) for other nsf grants when more than ,000 has been budgeted in the proposal for repair, alteration or improvement (construction) of a building or facility. it is, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared. you will not be able to finally submit your application until we receive the outstanding documentation.(a) materials and supplies (including costs of computing devices) (line g1 on the proposal budget). "rapid" proposal type must be selected in the proposal preparation module in fastlane. many of these mechanisms are funded by interested nsf programs on the basis of merit-reviewed proposals. substantial collaboration with individuals not included in the budget should be described in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal (see gpg chapter ii.

GPG Chapter II. Proposal Preparation Instructions

(x) amount of this request (line l on the proposal budget). to our recommended word limit - the selectors don't have time to read huge documents running to many pages.(b) publication/documentation/dissemination (line g2 on the proposal budget)., equipment and other resources: if there will be support from other sources for the conference, such information should be included in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal. any of the following items on the proposal cover sheet apply to a proposal, the applicable box(es) must be checked.(b) publication/documentation/dissemination (line g2 on the proposal budget)..Nsf encourages submission of proposals by groups of investigators; often these are submitted to carry out interdisciplinary projects. any request to support such items must be clearly disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and be included in the nsf award budget. authorization to deviate from nsf proposal preparation requirements (if applicable). any pi or co-pi identified on the proposal has received nsf funding with a start date17 in the past five years (including any current funding and no cost extensions), information on the award is required for each pi and co-pi, regardless of whether the support was directly related to the proposal or not. fastlane uses the rules specified for each type of proposal, (e. this supplementary document should describe how the proposal will conform to nsf policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results (see aag chapter vi.(viii) indirect costs (also known as facilities and administrative costs (f&a) for colleges and universities) (line i on the proposal budget). the personnel categories listed below, the proposal also may include information on exceptional qualifications that merit consideration in the evaluation of the proposal. please make sure that each page of your research proposal bears your name in a header or footer. proposal must contain a summary of the proposed project not more than one page in length.[ ] proposal budget:[ ] each budget line item is documented and justified in the budget justification. the specific nature, purpose, and need for equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in the proposal to permit evaluation by knowledgeable reviewers. of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited and line m on the proposal budget will not be available for use by the proposer..2) (note: this box is applicable only to proposals submitted to the biological sciences directorate. any request to support such items must be clearly disclosed in the proposal budget, justified in the budget justification, and be included in the nsf award budget. you must pay using the website (credit or debit card) in order to submit your documents and application online. not send non-documentary materials such as dvds, cds or large publications, as we do not have the facilities to include these with your application file and they will be discarded. this supplementary document should describe how the proposal will conform to nsf policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results (see aag chapter vi. terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person, primary covered transaction, principal, proposal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the definitions and coverage sections of the rules implementing executive order 12549. travel proposals may request support only for the international travel costs of the proposed activity. this generally includes the following types of activities: reports, reprints, page charges or other journal costs (except costs for prior or early publication); necessary illustrations; cleanup, documentation, storage and indexing of data and databases; development, documentation and debugging of software; and storage, preservation, documentation, indexing, etc. these strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. this effort must be documented in accordance with 2 cfr 200, subpart e. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. do not send supporting documents directly to the academic department as this will delay your application.(2) where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall include an explanation with this proposal. proposals must include an authorization to deviate from standard nsf proposal preparation instructions in one of the following ways, as appropriate: (a) by identifying the solicitation number that authorized the deviation in the appropriate block on the cover sheet; or (b) for individual deviations, by identifying the name, date and title of the nsf official authorizing the deviation. proposers also may designate persons they would prefer not review the proposal, indicating why. for purposes of meeting the mentoring requirement, simultaneously submitted collaborative proposals, and collaborative proposals that include subawards, constitute a single unified project. pi(s) must contact the nsf program officer(s) whose expertise is most germane to the proposal topic prior to submission of an eager proposal. proposals will be reviewed internally by the cognizant nsf program officers, the ideas lab panelists, and other external reviewers, as appropriate. such documentation may be required in final reports and is subject to audit. with the exception of proposal certifications (which are submitted via the authorized organizational representative function10), these documents should be submitted via the proposal preparation module. of mentoring activities include, but are not limited to: career counseling; training in preparation of grant proposals, publications and presentations; guidance on ways to improve teaching and mentoring skills; guidance on how to effectively collaborate with researchers from diverse backgrounds and disciplinary areas; and training in responsible professional practices./phd applications that are received without a research proposal that addresses these questions will not be considered. proposal may request funds under any of the categories listed so long as the item and amount are considered necessary, reasonable, allocable, and allowable under 2 cfr 200, subpart e, nsf policy, and/or the program solicitation. proposals must include a supplementary document of no more than two pages labeled "data management plan".

must be especially careful to follow accepted scholarly practices in providing citations for source materials relied upon when preparing any section of the proposal. funding of eager awards may be requested only through submission of a proposal that will be subject to full external merit review. within seven to fourteen days following the ideas lab, the nsf program officers will determine which project ideas are meritorious and should be invited as full proposals. a description of such support should be included in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal. proposal must contain a budget for each year of support requested. regarding organizational support: the aor is required to complete a certification that there is organizational support for the proposal as required by section 526 of the america competes reauthorization act of 2010. the proposal preparation checklist (gpg exhibit ii-1) may be used to assist in this review. if the specific location of the international conference is not known at the time of the proposal submission, proposers should enter "worldwide" on the cover sheet. organizational support will be made available, as described in the proposal, in order to address the broader impacts and intellectual merit activities to be undertaken. must follow instructions for selection of an applicable nsf division/office and program(s) to which the proposal should be directed. section of the proposal is used to assess the adequacy of the resources available to perform the effort proposed to satisfy both the intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria." as such, the information is not provided to reviewers for use in the review of the proposal.(3) the undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. proposal budget may request costs for professional and consultant services. all collaborative proposals arranged as separate submissions from multiple organizations must be submitted via fastlane. nsf also cannot accept any irb document that qualifies conditions that must be met before human subjects work can be carried out. such personal information is not appropriate for the biographical sketch and is not relevant to the merits of the proposal. letters of support submitted in response to a program solicitation requirement must be unique to the specific proposal submitted and cannot be altered without the authors explicit prior approval.[ ] special information and supplementary documentation:[ ] the types of information identified in gpg chapter ii.(c) consultant services (also referred to as professional service costs) (line g3 on the proposal budget). currently, the allocation process for that resource is done directly via proposal submission to the cognizant program officer in the division of advanced cyberinfrastructure within the nsf directorate for computer & information science & engineering. in order to qualify for support, however, attendance at meetings or conferences must be necessary to accomplish proposal objectives, or disseminate its results. organizations are responsible for identifying nsf-funded life sciences proposals that could potentially be considered dual use research of concern as defined in the us government policy for institutional oversight of life sciences dual use research of concern and for compliance with the requirements established in that policy. however, proposers are advised that they are still responsible for ensuring that biographical sketches created using third-party solutions are compliant with nsf proposal preparation requirements.(ii) the lead organization must then enter each non-lead organization(s) proposal pin and temporary proposal id into the fastlane lead proposal by using the "link collaborative proposals" option found on the fastlane "form preparation" screen. proposers are strongly advised to review the applicable sections of the gpg pertinent to the type of proposal being developed prior to submission. single proposal method allows investigators from two or more organizations who have developed an integrated research project to submit a single, focused proposal. most frequent delays to applications are caused by applicants not uploading the correct documents. requested proposal information noted above will be used to determine the applicable proposal preparation business rules that must be followed. any of the following items on the proposal cover sheet apply to a proposal, the applicable box(es) must be checked. pi(s) must contact the nsf program officer(s) whose expertise is most germane to the proposal topic before submitting a rapid proposal. note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this guide; eager proposals must otherwise be compliant with the gpg. this description must be succinct, not necessarily as detailed as in a full research proposal, and must emphasize the intrinsic merit of the activity and the importance of the equipment to it. this statement must include all of the information requested on the proposal budget for each person involved. the proposal is:A collaborative proposal from one organization (see gpg chapter ii. remember that it is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete, including all references, the transcript and the fee, and where applicable gre/gmat scores and research proposal. however, inclusion of a subaward or contract in the proposal budget or submission of a request after issuance of an nsf award to add a subaward or contract will document the organizational determination required.[ ] the proposal is responsive to and compliant with the provisions in the program description, announcement, or solicitation. all collaborative proposals arranged as separate submissions from multiple organizations must be submitted via fastlane. proposal not accepted is defined as fastlane will not permit submission of the proposal.(i) each non-lead organization must assign their proposal a proposal pin. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal). proposals for conferences should generally be submitted at least a year in advance of the scheduled date.

ASA Committee on Funded Research Posts Document on Top

faqs regarding fastlane proposal preparation and submission also are available in the fastlane. you enter the uk on a student visa and we later withdraw your offer/registration due to the discovery of fraudulent documents, you should be aware that the uk home office may deport you, and also may ban you from the uk for up to ten years. any pi or co-pi identified on the proposal has received nsf funding with a start date17 in the past five years (including any current funding and no cost extensions), information on the award is required for each pi and co-pi, regardless of whether the support was directly related to the proposal or not. committee on funded research posts document on top statistical issues seen in proposals: requests comment and input.(vii) total direct costs (line h on the proposal budget). personnel categories listed on parts a and b of the proposal budget are defined as follows:1. for the definition and allowability of inclusion of fringe benefits on a proposal budget. prospective primary participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled "certification regarding debarment, suspension, ineligibility and voluntary exclusion - lower tier covered transaction", provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions. this support extends to the portion of the proposal developed to satisfy the broader impacts review criterion as well as the intellectual merit review criterion, and any additional review criteria specified in the solicitation. have synthesized and summarized the input to create a document titled, “statistical issues seen in non-statistics proposals”; this document shares similar content with the nih peer review notes article but is intended to provide more details and further recommendations. this proposal pin and the temporary proposal id generated by fastlane when the non-lead proposal is created must be provided to the lead organization before the lead organization submits its proposal to nsf. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. facilitate proposal preparation, frequently asked questions (faqs) regarding proposal preparation and submission are available on the nsf website. this statement must include all of the information requested on the proposal budget for each person involved. facilitate proposal preparation, frequently asked questions (faqs) regarding proposal preparation and submission are available on the nsf website. you should also be aware that all documents are non-returnable. their name(s) will remain on the cover sheet and the individual(s) role on the project should be described in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal. the number of participants to be supported must be entered in the parentheses on the proposal budget. conference proposal must contain the elements identified below:Project summary (gpg chapter ii..The required proposal certifications are as follows:Certification for authorized organizational representative (aor) or individual proposer: the aor is required to complete certifications regarding the accuracy and completeness of statements contained in the proposal, as well as to certify that the organization (or individual) agrees to accept the obligation to comply with award terms and conditions. in either case, the lead organizations proposal must contain all of the requisite sections as a single package to be provided to reviewers (that will happen automatically when procedures below are followed). for each proposal that describes an international activity, pis should list the primary countries involved on the cover sheet. gpg chapter v for guidance on preparation of renewal proposals.[ ] the proposal is responsive to and compliant with the provisions in the program description, announcement, or solicitation. we’ll then review the comments and case studies to create a final version of the document (version 2. information necessary for the review of a proposal must be contained in sections a through i of the proposal. proposals must include an authorization to deviate from standard nsf proposal preparation instructions in one of the following ways, as appropriate: (a) by identifying the solicitation number that authorized the deviation in the appropriate block on the cover sheet; or (b) for individual deviations, by identifying the name, date and title of the nsf official authorizing the deviation. however, proposers are advised that they are still responsible for ensuring that biographical sketches created using third-party solutions are compliant with nsf proposal preparation requirements. the budget justification must be no more than three pages per proposal.(iii) all components of the collaborative proposal must meet any established deadline date and time30, and failure to do so may result in the entire collaborative proposal being returned without review. the following sections are required for a collaborative proposal submitted by:Non-lead organization. the number of participants to be supported must be entered in the parentheses on the proposal budget..The required proposal certifications are as follows:Certification for authorized organizational representative (aor) or individual proposer: the aor is required to complete certifications regarding the accuracy and completeness of statements contained in the proposal, as well as to certify that the organization (or individual) agrees to accept the obligation to comply with award terms and conditions. documents so that each page is the same way up. each proposal26 that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers27 must include, as a supplementary document, a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such individuals. please check the current processing date before contacting us regarding your documents. nsf will not accept or will return without review proposals that are not consistent with these instructions. many of these mechanisms are funded by interested nsf programs on the basis of merit-reviewed proposals. for each proposal that describes an international activity, pis should list the primary countries involved on the cover sheet. for data management and sharing of the products of research, including preservation, documentation, and sharing of data, samples, physical collections, curriculum materials and other related research and education products should be described in the special information and supplementary documentation section of the proposal (see gpg chapter ii. regarding federal tax obligations: when the proposal exceeds ,000,000, the aor is required to complete a certification regarding federal tax obligations. personnel category for which nsf funds are requested must indicate, in the parentheses provided on the proposal budget, the number of persons expected to receive some support from those funds.(ii) during the full proposal submission stage, the proposing organization should identify in the block entitled, "show related preliminary proposal number", the related preliminary proposal number assigned by nsf.

Reference Documents - Research Participant Portal

if your documents are not in english, we must receive a translation carried out by an accredited translator (eg, the british council). prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to whom this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. the data management plan will be reviewed as an integral part of the proposal, considered under intellectual merit or broader impacts or both, as appropriate for the scientific community of relevance. submit the collaborative proposal, the following process must be completed:29.[ ] proposal budget:[ ] each budget line item is documented and justified in the budget justification. the proposal budget also may request costs for leasing of computer equipment. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. the letter should indicate approval of the proposed activities, explicitly listing the proposers name and referencing the title of the nsf proposal, and must be submitted prior to an award being issued. concurrent submission of a proposal to other organizations will not prejudice its review by nsf.(c) consultant services (also referred to as professional service costs) (line g3 on the proposal budget). requests are made in conjunction with regular competitive proposals, or as a supplemental funding request to an existing nsf award. if certification of exemption is provided after submission of the proposal and before the award is issued, the exemption number corresponding to one or more of the exemption categories also must be included in the documentation provided to nsf. renewed funding of an ideas lab award may be requested only through submission of a full proposal that will be subject to external merit review. organization where the reviewer is an officer, director, trustee, or partner,Has a financial interest in the outcome of the proposal. only acceptable irb approval documents are those that approve a human subjects research protocol; approvals "in concept" are not acceptable. each section of the proposal that is uploaded as a file should be individually paginated prior to being uploaded to the electronic system. for additional guidance on mentoring and data management plan requirements for collaborative proposals." proposers are advised to select "no closing date" when the proposal is not submitted in response to any relevant nsf funding opportunity (which includes program descriptions, announcements, or solicitations). signing the proposal, the authorized organizational representative hereby certifies that the organization will comply with title vi of the civil rights act of 1964 (42 usc 2000d), title ix of the education amendments of 1972 (20 usc 1681 et seq. proposal not accepted is defined as fastlane will not permit submission of the proposal. is important that all proposals conform to the instructions provided in the gpg or nsf grants. rapid funding mechanism is used for proposals having a severe urgency with regard to availability of, or access to, data, facilities or specialized equipment, including quick-response research on natural or anthropogenic disasters and similar unanticipated events. this effort must be documented in accordance with 2 cfr 200, subpart e. failure to submit the required sections will result in the proposal not being accepted14, or being returned without review. travel proposals may request support only for the international travel costs of the proposed activity. a description of such support should be included in the facilities, equipment and other resources section of the proposal. such information should be clearly identified as "other personnel" biographical information and uploaded as a single pdf file in the other supplementary documents section of the proposal. you in advance for your help to strengthen this document which we hope will help non-statistics grant applicants strengthen their proposals, ultimately leading to better science. organizational support will be made available, as described in the proposal, in order to address the broader impacts and intellectual merit activities to be undertaken. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal). these exploratory proposals also may be submitted directly to an nsf program, but the eager mechanism should not be used for projects that are appropriate for submission as "regular" (i. signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary participant is providing the certification set out below. your proposal should be approximately 1,500 words in length (outline proposals for mres programmes can be shorter). proposals are reviewed for both their scientific and computational needs. proposal budget may request funds for the costs of documenting, preparing, publishing or otherwise making available to others the findings and products of the work conducted under the grant. regarding organizational support: the aor is required to complete a certification that there is organizational support for the proposal as required by section 526 of the america competes reauthorization act of 2010. if certification of exemption is provided after submission of the proposal and before the award is issued, the exemption number corresponding to one or more of the exemption categories also must be included in the documentation provided to nsf. proposals to any nsf program require operational worksheets by the first wednesday of june in the year before any proposed fieldwork. organization where the reviewer is an officer, director, trustee, or partner,Has a financial interest in the outcome of the proposal. at the nsf program officers discretion (subject to division director concurrence), they may invite none, some, or all of the project ideas as full proposals, with the final funding decision to occur after the full proposals have been received and reviewed. the application must be submitted as a preliminary proposal in fastlane. letters of collaboration are permitted, unless required by a specific program solicitation, letters of support should not be submitted as they are not a standard component of an nsf proposal. in cases where the pi or co-pi has received more than one award (excluding amendments to existing awards), they need only report on the one award most closely related to the proposal.

Uk techincal resume database

the box for "proprietary or privileged information" must be checked on the proposal cover sheet when the proposal contains confidential budgetary information. the proposal preparation checklist (gpg exhibit ii-1) may be used to assist in this review. requirements apply to all uploaded sections of a proposal, including supplementary documentation. make sure that all scanned documents are legible, and attached in a commonly used format such as jpeg, pdf or word document. programmes may have specific requirements regarding the research proposal; please check before you apply. the checklist is not intended to be an all-inclusive repetition of the required proposal contents and associated proposal preparation guidelines. proposal not accepted is defined as fastlane will not permit submission of the proposal. project summary may only be uploaded as a supplementary document if use of special characters is necessary. collaborative proposal is one in which investigators from two or more organizations wish to collaborate on a unified research project. conformance with all preparation and submission instructions is required and will be strictly enforced unless a deviation has been approved in advance of proposal submission.(vi) other direct costs (lines g1 through g6 on the proposal budget). this description must be succinct, not necessarily as detailed as in a full research proposal, and must emphasize the intrinsic merit of the activity and the importance of the equipment to it. rapid funding mechanism is used for proposals having a severe urgency with regard to availability of, or access to, data, facilities or specialized equipment, including quick-response research on natural or anthropogenic disasters and similar unanticipated events. please note that some program solicitations provide specific guidance on preparation and inclusion of management plans in proposals submitted to nsf. a general policy, nsf limits the salary compensation requested in the proposal budget for senior personnel to no more than two months of their regular salary in any one year. if the proposal is not submitted in response to a specific program description, announcement, or solicitation, proposers should select "grant proposal guide. are advised that fastlane does not automatically paginate a proposal. be considered for admission, all applicants must supply the documents a to f below, and g to k where applicable. such proposals would be designated as an "ideas lab renewal. proposal budget justification should indicate the general types of expendable materials and supplies required. all other elements of a "full proposal" are waived (i. you may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. if irb approval cannot be obtained at the time of the award action because the development of a human subjects research protocol requires preliminary or other conceptual work to take place, the pi should notify the cognizant nsf program officer assigned to the proposal..2) (note: this box is applicable only to proposals submitted to the biological sciences directorate. adherence to type size and line spacing requirements also is necessary to ensure that no proposer will have an unfair advantage, by using smaller type or line spacing to provide more text in the proposal. should be consulted to prepare this portion of the proposal. proposals to nsf will be reviewed using the two nsb-approved merit review criteria described in greater length in gpg chapter iii. will be asked to comment on the quality of the prior work described in this section of the proposal. the aor must use the "authorized organizational representative function" in fastlane to sign and submit the proposal, including the proposal certifications. participant support costs must be specified, itemized and justified in the budget justification section of the proposal. proposers are strongly advised to review the applicable sections of the gpg pertinent to the type of proposal being developed prior to submission. the amounts for each budget line item requested must be documented and justified in the budget justification as specified below. it is, however, meant to highlight certain critical items so they will not be overlooked when the proposal is prepared. prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction. renewed funding of an ideas lab award may be requested only through submission of a full proposal that will be subject to external merit review. pi(s) must contact the nsf program officer(s) whose expertise is most germane to the proposal topic before submitting a rapid proposal. information should be clearly identified as "equipment proposal" biographical information and uploaded as a single pdf file in the other supplementary documents section of the proposal. in such cases, the item for senior personnel salaries in the proposal may appear as a single figure and the person-months represented by that amount omitted. if included, these resources will not be auditable and must not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. currently, the allocation process for that resource is done directly via proposal submission to the cognizant program officer in the division of advanced cyberinfrastructure within the nsf directorate for computer & information science & engineering. overview includes a description of the activity that would result if the proposal were funded and a statement of objectives and methods to be employed. the approval letter must affirm that an animal-use protocol covering the proposed activities has been approved, and should explicitly list the proposers name, the title and number of the nsf proposal, and the date of iacuc approval.(f) if the proposal is for renewed support, a description of the relation of the completed work to the proposed work.

Go HOme Sitemap